[distcc] Re: distcc 2.9 released

Dag Wieers dag at wieers.com
Thu Jul 24 22:35:26 GMT 2003

On 25 Jul 2003, Ben Elliston wrote:

> Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> writes:
> > I personally think the 'redhat' is very important there. unknown would 
> > clash with other compilers from other distros.
> Exactly!  There should be no difference!
> If there is, then you should use a (mis)feature test to detect it.

I understand, but I have no clue how to test it and I'd rather be safe 
then sorry. If I'd be sure that some of the RH compilers are default 
compilers, I'm willing to change the manufacturer field.

>From the few times I've seen the gcc package, I remember seperate patches 
included, which is very likely since Red Hat/Cygnus has a very close 
relation to the GCC development.

--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

More information about the distcc mailing list