[distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc

[Zack Weinberg]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat.com> writes:

> On Jul 10, 2003, "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah.  I vote always do it, too.
>
> Fine, I'll do that.  As long as there's a way to disable it, I'm fine
> with it.  I dislike that it will prevent legitimate uses of ccache and
> make gcc different from all other compilers in this regard, but, heck,
> I don't want to fight over this.

I don't understand.  On by default makes sense precisely because
there's no bad side effect to this feature.  If there *is* a bad
side effect which I'm not aware of, then my opinion may be different,
but I don't see how having this information in the .i file can
possibly interfere with anything.

zw