[distcc] Re: xinetd 2.3.11-1.8.0

[Jeff]

Dag Wieers wrote:
> The xinetd packages is always replacing /etc/services so that Red Hat can 
> update the file. It would be nice if there was a /etc/services.d ;-)

Although my services file probably did get overwritten during the 
upgrade, distcc used to work fine without a services entry! I guess that 
was part of the security fix to xinetd?

> However, since distcc has a registered port with IANA, I would guess that 
> in the not-so-distant future distcc would be part of Red Hat's list ?
> 
> Maybe adding a report on bugzilla would get the proper attention.

I don't have bugzilla access... anyone want to step up to the plate?


-- Jeff