[distcc] distcc & glibc-2.2.5 & gcc-3.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 11, 2002, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:

> On 10 Oct 2002, Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br> wrote:
>> On Oct 10, 2002, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
>> 
>> > The problem is that in this context distcc incorrectly thinks the .S
>> > file is the name of the compiler.
>> 
>> And it couldn't possibly tell otherwise should the .S file be
>> executable.

> Actually, it can tell, because it looks like a source file name.

Err...  So if I name my compilers compile.c and compile.C, distcc will
take them as source file names instead of as compiler names?  This
doesn't sound right to me.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer