[distcc] Load balancing
mbp at samba.org
Wed Sep 11 13:02:00 GMT 2002
On 11 Sep 2002, Tim Small <tim at digitalbrain.com> wrote:
> Mmm, we've chosen to use LVS for this, as I've previously said, and I
> think this is probably a good generic way to solve this sort of
I really do wonder if the load will fluctuate too fast for LVS to do
well. But the proof is in the pudding -- let's get some numbers on
going over LVS versus the built-in spreader across all the machines.
It is nice that LVS can be done transparently to the application.
More information about the distcc