[distcc] Load balancing

[Martin Pool]

On 11 Sep 2002, Tim Small <tim at digitalbrain.com> wrote:

> Mmm, we've chosen to use LVS for this, as I've previously said, and I 
> think this is probably a good generic way to solve this sort of
> problem 

I really do wonder if the load will fluctuate too fast for LVS to do
well.  But the proof is in the pudding -- let's get some numbers on
going over LVS versus the built-in spreader across all the machines.

It is nice that LVS can be done transparently to the application.

-- 
Martin