[cifs-protocol] [EXTERNAL] "Flags" field in [MS-SMB2] 184.108.40.206.1 Symbolic Link Error Response? - TrackingID#2211090040006372
srenaden at microsoft.com
Thu Nov 10 21:27:55 UTC 2022
Hello Volker, what is the storage behind SMB server ? is it just a local disk ? Also do you see this error only on that 2016 server or you think it reproduces on other servers? E.g. Server 2019? Please share the build number of your 2016 server ( you may use winver to get that).
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
From: Michael Bowen <Mike.Bowen at microsoft.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 11:52 AM
To: Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org; Microsoft Support <supportmail at microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] "Flags" field in [MS-SMB2] 220.127.116.11.1 Symbolic Link Error Response? - TrackingID#2211090040006372
[DocHelp to bcc, Support mail to cc]
Thanks for your inquiry. I've created case number 2211090040006372 to track this issue. In your correspondence, please leave the case number in the subject line and use reply all. One of our engineers will contact you soon
Escalation Engineer - Microsoft Open Specifications
From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 1:49 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at microsoft.com>
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] "Flags" field in [MS-SMB2] 18.104.22.168.1 Symbolic Link Error Response?
[MS-SMB2] 22.214.171.124.1 describes the Flags field to have one of two
values: 0 (absolute symlink) and 1 (relative symlink).
Attached find a network trace of a test against Windows 2016 Standard. In frame 33 the test creates a symlink, and in frame 39 it tries to open it. Frame 40 correctly replies with NT_STATUS_STOPPED_ON_SYMLINK, but the "Flags" field has a value of 0x20000001. What is that additional bit?
More information about the cifs-protocol