[cifs-protocol] [REG:116102714860400] [MS-RPCE] epm_Map object uuid ignored?
obaidf at microsoft.com
Thu Oct 27 19:46:05 UTC 2016
I'll help you with this question and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer.
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at ramagane at Microsoft dot com
From: Bryan Burgin
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:08 AM
To: Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org>
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org; MSSolve Case Email <casemail at microsoft.com>
Subject: [REG:116102714860400] [MS-RPCE] epm_Map object uuid ignored?
[dochelp to bcc]
Thank you for your question. We created SR 116102714860400 to track this issue. An engineer with the protocols team will contact you soon.
From: Andreas Schneider [mailto:asn at samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:06 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at microsoft.com>
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
Subject: [MS-RPCE] epm_Map object uuid ignored?
I would like some clarification about:
184.108.40.206.5 ept_map Method
The resulting method definition is specified as follows.
[in] handle_t hEpMapper,
[in, ptr] UUID* obj,
[in, ptr] twr_p_t map_tower,
[in, out] ept_lookup_handle_t* entry_handle, [in, range(0,500)] unsigned long max_towers, [out] unsigned long* num_towers, [out, ptr, size_is(max_towers), length_is(*num_towers)]
[out] error_status* status
obj: Optionally specifies an object UUID. A value of NULL indicates that no object UUID is specified.
>From our investigation, it looks like the obj is completely ignored in Windows and this is not documented. The OpenGroup implementation checks if
it is a valid object id of a registered interface.
Could you please clarify in the docs if it is ignored and if not what is the difference to the OpenGroup implementation or specification.
Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D
Samba Team asn at samba.org
More information about the cifs-protocol