[cifs-protocol] [REG:115030312463847] Re: [MS-KILE] "View effective Access - Parameter is incorrect" -- Issue re TGS-REQ (S4U2Self)

[Obaid Farooqi]

Hi Andrew,
I have filed a TDI to document the SPN requirement.
I'll continue to explore the difference between behaviors when DC is Samba and will update you.

Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft

Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org] 
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 5:31 PM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:115030312463847] Re: [MS-KILE] "View effective Access - Parameter is incorrect" -- Issue re TGS-REQ (S4U2Self)

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 22:32 +0000, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
> Does my answer resolve your issue?
> I am asking since I answered your basic question. 

Thanks, it is great to see the SPN requirement in writing.  Can we get at added to the WSPP docs?

> I am working on figuring out why Windows client sends different sname based on the type of DC but this is a side issue, not the question you asked. Can I mark the case solution provided?

Thanks.  That would be interesting to understand. 

Andrew Bartlett

--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba