[cifs-protocol] [REG:110122101544609] RE: authority section return for unknown replies

[tridge at samba.org]

Hi Hongwei,

 >   I just want to check to see if you have any more questions about
 >   this request.  If not, I will close this case after the new year
 >   since you may be on vocation.

I think this one can be closed. Your analysis makes sense, and while
it differs from bind9 behaviour, it does seem to match the optional
behaviour in RFC1034 section 4.3.4. 

I'll ask the bind developers about why bind doesn't implement that
feature.

Thanks!

Cheers, Tridge