[cifs-protocol] [REG:110122101544609] RE: authority section return for unknown replies

tridge at samba.org tridge at samba.org
Tue Jan 11 15:17:32 MST 2011

Hi Hongwei,

 >   I just want to check to see if you have any more questions about
 >   this request.  If not, I will close this case after the new year
 >   since you may be on vocation.

I think this one can be closed. Your analysis makes sense, and while
it differs from bind9 behaviour, it does seem to match the optional
behaviour in RFC1034 section 4.3.4. 

I'll ask the bind developers about why bind doesn't implement that


Cheers, Tridge

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list