[cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091111600231 [MS-ADA3]: 2.115 Structure of prefixMap over LDAP
billwe at microsoft.com
Thu Jan 28 09:46:25 MST 2010
Good day Andrew & Kamen. Please note that my colleague Sebastian (who took ownership of this case from Obaid) is out of the office for the next few days.
In the interim, I will be your contact. Thanks in advance for your patience!
Andrew - I sent a status update request for the TDI (which has been in suspense since one of your previous emails (shown at the end of this message). I will advise you as soon as I receive a response.
Kamen - I have already performed some investigation concerning those 20 other prefixMap entries, and expect to follow up with your tomorrow morning.
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
Email: billwe at microsoft.com
Tel: +1(980) 776-8200
Cell: +1(704) 661-5438
Fax: +1(704) 665-9606
From: Kamen Mazdrashki [mailto:kamen.mazdrashki at postpath.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:09 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi; abartlet at samba.org
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] Structure of prefixMap over LDAP
Could you please point out where those default 39 entries for prefixMap are described?
I am looking at: <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc228445%28PROT.13%29.aspx>
and there are only 19 default prefixes listed here.
kamen.mazdrashki at postpath.com <mailto:kamen.mazdrashki at postpath.com>
CISCO SYSTEMS BULGARIA EOOD
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:39 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org; pfif at tridgell.net
Subject: RE: Structure of prefixMap over LDAP
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 06:22 +0000, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
> In an effort to fully understand your goals, please explain what you
> are looking to achieve through the addition of documentation that
> defines the internal structure of the prefixMap attribute.
As a start:
The ability to generate a matching prefixMap attribute, should any client request it. The ability to verify prefixMap values over DRS and LDAP to confirm consistency. The ability to include prefixMap values in comparison tests we may make between AD and Samba4. An understanding of how the contents of this attribute interacts with msDs-intID and other prefix mapping functionality.
Finally, I'm simply looking to ensure that the documentation set explains the format of every value (generated or otherwise) in AD, so we don't have to come back to this later.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
More information about the cifs-protocol