[cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER

Luke Howard lukeh at padl.com
Wed Apr 7 04:24:48 MDT 2010

On 07/04/2010, at 11:02 AM, Nadezhda Ivanova wrote:

> Hi Hongwei,
> Thanks a lot! I suppose I got confused because 2.2.10 states:
> I was not sure if both flags have the same value, or the value is just for FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN.

My understanding is that the flag meaning depends on the context (ie. the object class). So the same values may have completely different meanings for different classes.

-- Luke

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list