[cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
lukeh at padl.com
Wed Apr 7 04:24:48 MDT 2010
On 07/04/2010, at 11:02 AM, Nadezhda Ivanova wrote:
> Hi Hongwei,
> Thanks a lot! I suppose I got confused because 2.2.10 states:
> PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, 0x00000002)
> I was not sure if both flags have the same value, or the value is just for FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN.
My understanding is that the flag meaning depends on the context (ie. the object class). So the same values may have completely different meanings for different classes.
More information about the cifs-protocol