[cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
Nadezhda Ivanova
nadezhda.ivanova at postpath.com
Wed Apr 7 03:02:52 MDT 2010
Hi Hongwei,
Thanks a lot! I suppose I got confused because 2.2.10 states:
PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, 0x00000002)
I was not sure if both flags have the same value, or the value is just for FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN.
Regards,
Nadya
----- Original Message -----
> From: Hongwei Sun <hongweis at microsoft.com>
> To: Nadezhda Ivanova <nadezhda.ivanova at postpath.com>, Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at winse.microsoft.com>
> Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org <cifs-protocol at samba.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2010 5:53:01 PM (GMT+02:00) Helsinki, Kyiv, Riga, Sofia, Tallinn, Vilnius
> Subject: [REG:110040646791367] : RE: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
> > Nadya,
>
> The definition of the valid systemFlags can be found in 2.2.10 and
> 2.2.11 of MS-ADTS. The numeric values of the two flags you mentioned
> are:
>
> PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN,
> 0x00000002) 2.2.10 MS-ADTS System Flags
>
> CR (FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL, 0x00000001)
> 2.2.11 MS-ADTS schemaFlagsEx Flags
>
> Please let us know if you have more questions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Hongwei
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org
> [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Nadezhda Ivanova
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:07 AM
> To: Interoperability Documentation Help
> Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of
> FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
>
> Hi,
> I am not able to find the actual numerical value of
> FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL (systemFlagsEx) and
> FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER for systemFlags. I am working on
> access checks for DRS replication and this blocks my work, so I would
> appreciate a fast response...
>
> Regards,
> Nadya
> _______________________________________________
> cifs-protocol mailing list
> cifs-protocol at cifs.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list