[cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER

Nadezhda Ivanova nadezhda.ivanova at postpath.com
Wed Apr 7 03:02:52 MDT 2010


Hi Hongwei,
Thanks a lot! I suppose I got confused because 2.2.10 states:
PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, 0x00000002)
I was not sure if both flags have the same value, or the value is just for FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN.

Regards,
Nadya

----- Original Message -----
> From: Hongwei Sun <hongweis at microsoft.com>
> To: Nadezhda Ivanova <nadezhda.ivanova at postpath.com>, Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at winse.microsoft.com>
> Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org <cifs-protocol at samba.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2010 5:53:01 PM (GMT+02:00) Helsinki, Kyiv, Riga, Sofia, Tallinn, Vilnius
> Subject: [REG:110040646791367] : RE: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER

> > Nadya,
> 
>    The definition of the valid systemFlags can be found in 2.2.10 and 
> 2.2.11 of MS-ADTS.  The numeric values of the two flags you mentioned 
> are:
>  
> 	PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, 
> 0x00000002)   2.2.10 MS-ADTS  System Flags
> 
>       CR (FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL, 0x00000001)                           
>           2.2.11 MS-ADTS  schemaFlagsEx Flags
> 
>   Please let us know if you have more questions.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Hongwei           
>         
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org 
> [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Nadezhda Ivanova
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:07 AM
> To: Interoperability Documentation Help
> Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of 
> FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER
> 
> Hi,
> I am not able to find the actual numerical value of 
> FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL (systemFlagsEx) and 
> FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER for systemFlags. I am working on 
> access checks for DRS replication and this blocks my work, so I would 
> appreciate a fast response...
> 
> Regards,
> Nadya
> _______________________________________________
> cifs-protocol mailing list
> cifs-protocol at cifs.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list