[cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 06:03 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> We have completed our investigation and have updated the documentation 
> to remove references that specify a parameter as little endian where 
> the values endianess is negotiated by the underlying RPC protocol as 
> we discussed previously.  Here is the list of fields in which the endianess text was removed:

Thankyou.  

However, have you made investigations to see if this has occurred in any
other protocols?  

For example, MS-ADTS 7.3.1.1 continues the fine tradition of claiming to
present a bit table in little endian, but it is actually big-endian (and
is an integer string on LDAP, and little-endian in the NBT netlogon
dgram 7.3.1.4).

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20090529/61a05bb4/attachment.bin