[cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 18.104.22.168
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jun 19 21:37:34 GMT 2008
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 09:06 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Which flag are you referring to ? The only flag I know of related
> to this is the NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_WITH_IP flag which the client
> must specify for the server to fill in the DcSockAddr field. Please
That's what I mean. I note that modern clients such as Vista Ultimate
don't seem to send this flag in their default query, so wondered if this
part of the protocol was some deprecated experiment no longer in use.
Alternately, in what situations would a Microsoft client set this flag?
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080620/e546f709/attachment.bin
More information about the cifs-protocol