[cifs-protocol] RE: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken , NT20Token

Hongwei Sun hongweis at microsoft.com
Mon Jun 16 20:32:27 GMT 2008


   The development of test suite for [MS-ADTS] has started and is in progress.


Hongwei  Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol  Team, Microsoft
hongweis at microsoft.com
Tel:  469-7757027 x 57027

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken ,NT20Token

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
>    After investigation , we have the following responses to your
> questions.
>   (1)  For NtVersion field in NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_EX or
> NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE,  The returned value always has
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1 bit turned on , in addition to the original
> request.
>     For example, if 04:00:00:00 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX) is sent as
> request, NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE response will be returned with
> NtVersion equal to 05 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX |
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1).   For request
> 08:00:00:00(NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_IP),  the response will be 0D
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1).  We will update the documentation in the
> future release.
>   (2)  lmNTToken and NT20Token should be 0xFFFF.  We will incorporate
> the changes to the documentation.


Per my original question:

> Are any of the expected values in this document backed by a testcase that shows them to be true?

Can you give any status on if this protocol has been though your testsuite building process yet?


Andrew Bartlett
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list