[cifs-protocol] RE: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken ,
NT20Token
Hongwei Sun
hongweis at microsoft.com
Mon Jun 16 20:32:27 GMT 2008
Andrew,
The development of test suite for [MS-ADTS] has started and is in progress.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------
Hongwei Sun - Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongweis at microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027 x 57027
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken ,NT20Token
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> After investigation , we have the following responses to your
> questions.
>
> (1) For NtVersion field in NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_EX or
> NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE, The returned value always has
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1 bit turned on , in addition to the original
> request.
>
> For example, if 04:00:00:00 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX) is sent as
> request, NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE response will be returned with
> NtVersion equal to 05 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX |
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1). For request
> 08:00:00:00(NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_IP), the response will be 0D
> ((NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX | NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_IP|
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1). We will update the documentation in the
> future release.
>
> (2) lmNTToken and NT20Token should be 0xFFFF. We will incorporate
> the changes to the documentation.
Thanks.
Per my original question:
> Are any of the expected values in this document backed by a testcase that shows them to be true?
Can you give any status on if this protocol has been though your testsuite building process yet?
Thanks,
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list