[cifs-protocol] Re: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken ,
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jun 11 00:58:22 GMT 2008
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> After investigation , we have the following responses to your
> (1) For NtVersion field in NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_EX or
> NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE, The returned value always has
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1 bit turned on , in addition to the original
> For example, if 04:00:00:00 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX) is sent as
> request, NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE response will be returned with
> NtVersion equal to 05 (NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX |
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1). For request
> 08:00:00:00(NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_IP), the response will be 0D
> ((NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX | NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_5EX_IP|
> NETLOGON_NT_VERSION_1). We will update the documentation in the
> future release.
> (2) lmNTToken and NT20Token should be 0xFFFF. We will incorporate
> the changes to the documentation.
Per my original question:
> Are any of the expected values in this document backed by a testcase that shows them to be true?
Can you give any status on if this protocol has been though your
testsuite building process yet?
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080611/0652913b/attachment.bin
More information about the cifs-protocol