[cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 -
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Aug 26 22:50:27 GMT 2008
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 14:21 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> I will be working with you to resolve your issue. I had a quick
> question to help with our research:
> If you have a secret object with old/new secret values set. They also
> both have a timestamp indicating when the values were last
> updated/set. You call LsarSetSecret passing in null for new secret
> value and some value for old secret value. You observe that the old
> secret value timestamp = ?, You observe that the new secret value
> timestamp = ? (Please let me know what these values are in the test
> you reference).
The old secret timestamp and the new secret timestamp is 'current server
time' (or at least the same, my tests don't actually verify the clock).
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080827/f6b602d4/attachment.bin
More information about the cifs-protocol