[cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 08:51 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> As per your last mail, we agree this looks like a good scenario to
> target for the upcoming IO lab.  As we have discussed, in order to not
> waste time on debugging setup while you are in the lab, we would need
> to work together prior to establish the correct repro environment.
> Establishment of this repro would require your expertise to ensure the
> environment accurately reproduces this issue.

Well, the NTLMv2 header signing is simply shown any time NTLMv2 is used
for sign or seal on DCE/RPC.  It is actually documented (if obliquely)
in the NTLM spec. 

> Let us know if this sounds like an acceptable action plan and we can
> work out the details on our next call together.

That sounds fine.  Should I just start a new VM on the isamba server, or
is there one I should use, or?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080814/b161f271/attachment.bin