[cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 07:40 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> The trace you sent previously lines up with expected behavior the
> documentation defines (This was also verified with a review of the
> code also).  You can see starting with packet 530 that the client
> tells the server that it does support signing but the server responds
> in packet 534 that it does not.  From there in frames 535-538 show the
> client and server not using header signing for the remainder of the
> conversation which is in line with the documentation.  We do see the
> client and server encrypting the body of the request as per the
> authentication level being set to Privacy.
> 
> Can you send a capture that exhibits the behavior you describe with
> NTLMv2 as well as clarify your comments about behavior you have seen
> in the past?  Basically I need as much information as you can provide
> on the behavior you have experienced to help understand the problem.
> This would help to isolate the behavior you are seeing and complete
> additional analysis as required.

We seem to have crossed threads here (see subject...). 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20080811/6c9bc44f/attachment.bin