[Samba] performance tweaks??

[steve]

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 01:15 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:10:41PM +1300, steve wrote:
> > I tried this, and ended up woth 2 pc's that could only see the top level
> > of the shaare. So I reverted it, and they *still* can only see one level
> > down.
> 
> Ok, well... Maybe you have upper/lower case directories in
> your shares? Sorry, I had thought that the meaning of those
> parameters is pretty obvious: They assume that all file
> names on disk are a specific case. You should add "default
> case = lower" if you have everything lower-case.
> 
> My apologies for not telling you in the first place,
> 
> Volker

As these are microsofties, there is mixed case and white space all over
the place. 

Will this have the desired effect? 

case sensitive = no
preserve case = no
short preserve case = no

I'm seeing noticeable degraded performance when swapping from the old
server, with samba 3.0.22, to a new server with double the memory, 50%
more horsepower and 30% faster disks, running 3.2.5. 

Any suggestions will be gratefully received.

Steve

-- 
Steve Holdoway <steve at greengecko.co.nz>
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
MSN: steve at greengecko.co.nz
GPG Fingerprint = B337 828D 03E1 4F11 CB90  853C C8AB AF04 EF68 52E0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20100121/18ac4a8c/attachment.pgp>