[Samba] Feedback to getting to samba 4 blog

[Robert Freeman-Day]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Guillaume Rousse wrote:

> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:38 +0100
> From: Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Feedback to getting to samba 4 blog
> 
> Le 14/01/2010 15:07, Andreas Moroder a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I did not find a way tu put my opinion to the blog so I answer here. I
>> hope this is ok.
>> 
>> We ( a public hospital ) are one of the few that have no AD, because I
>> wanted to wait that samba has this functionality.
>> Every solution that give us the stability of samba and also AD is ok for
>> us, but please this year, otherwise I will be force to start with MS AD.
> You can use AD, while still delegating autentication to a unix-based kerberos 
> realm. And use samba for print and file services.
>
> -- 
I can confirm that our environment was set up this way and worked.  One 
thing you will have to google if you go to AD with unix kerberos is "Cross 
Realm Trust".

I will also say that we consolidated our Kerberos KCD to just using the AD 
servers as KDCs.  With some hickups, it works passably.


- ---Robert Freeman-Day
- ---------------
I would really like you to be on my side,
but the side you show me isn't what I had in mind.

- -Judybats
GPG Public Key:
http:keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBA9DF9ED3E4C7D36

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktQjXEACgkQup357T5MfTZ4cwCdELuFyUZOGXeXMsnjwl5bROGN
lpcAoLRQEwlKbxT37NVBBgDk8UbMnnnH
=7iq0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----