Plans for integrating vfs proxy and security=server

[Amin Azez]

* Andrew Bartlett wrote, On 05/05/08 22:53:
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 18:13 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 05.05.2008, 13:46 +1000 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
>>> I've committed the security=server implementation into Samba4, but not
>>> any tests as yet.  I'm hoping that once we merge the vfs proxy backend
>>> (the CIFS Accelerator from Sam) into Samba4, that the testsuite we use
>>> there can cover the auth_server code too.
>>>
>>> How does that sound?
>> That makes a lot of sense. I guess just running smbclient with domain
>> creds against a standalone smbd configured to use auth_server should be
>> sufficient?
> 
> Yeah.  I figure we will have the proxy in 'make test' configured to
> accept either kerberos with domain credentials, or NTLM with the
> pass-though. We can do most of the tests with kerberos, and add quick
> smbclient invocation with NTLM to check that codepath. 


Aye; and also a double-proxy test.

I'm just fixing some rpm build errors and then hope to integrate the
pass-through and add the proxy test.

Sam