Antwort: Re: [jcifs] NTLM handshake slow, and interruped after the 3rd GET

[Balazs Szuecs]

"Use Integrated Windows Authentication" = yes
"Use HTTP/1.1" = yes
"Use HTTP/1.1 through proxy connections" = no (but the my tomcat runs on 
localhost)

I found a post in the archives, with the same problem:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/jcifs/2005-January/004525.html

there is suggested, that you should use an older jcifs version, such as 
0.9.6 - I tried it, and it works fine!!!!

I did some research, and I have found out, that those 60s delays are there 
because the browser assumes (why?) that it is SimpleNTLM, which is time 
based, and can count only in minutes. I don't really understand it, 
someone told it to me, and I simply believed it.

I don't know, what the difference between jcifs 1.1.7 and 0.9.6 is, but 
0.9.6 seems be ok for me

best regards
Balazs





Jason Bainbridge <jbainbridge at gmail.com>
08.02.2005 15:32
Bitte antworten an Jason Bainbridge
 
        An:     Balazs Szuecs <balazs.szuecs at wave-solutions.com>
        Kopie:  jcifs at lists.samba.org
        Thema:  Re: [jcifs] NTLM handshake slow, and interruped after the 
3rd GET


On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:07:25 +0100, Balazs Szuecs
<balazs.szuecs at wave-solutions.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am new to jCIFS, and I wanted to test the NTLM negotiation with a 
tomcat
> server. Here's my configuration:
> 
> jCIFS 1.1.7
> Tomcat 4.1
> IE 6.0
> Win XP

What do your options look like in Internet Explorer, specifically "USe
Integrated Windows Authentication", "Use HTTP/1.1" & "Use HTTP/1.1
through proxy connections"?


-- 
Jason Bainbridge
KDE - Conquer Your Desktop - http://kde.org
KDE Web Team - webmaster at kde