[PATCHSET] Move samba4 file server tests from knownfail to skip
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Tue Jun 28 16:30:31 UTC 2016
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 01:09:36PM +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Monday, 27 June 2016 12:53:53 CEST Ralph Boehme wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:45:35AM +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the attached patchset moves several tests from knownfail to skip. The idea
> > > is to get down the time 'make test' runs a bit. There is no need to run
> > > tests of features we will not implement anyway.
> > >
> > > Review and push is much appreciated!
> >
> > hm, for both
> >
> > selftest: Remove non-existent samba4.smb2.oplock.doc test
>
> make test TESTS="samba4.smb2.oplock.doc"
>
> doesn't do anything if you remove it. So 'make test' doesn't know about it.
>
> > and
> >
> > selftest: Remove non-existent samba4.raw.session tests
>
> make test TESTS="samba4.raw.session"
>
> doesn't do anything if you remove it. So there are no tests planned.
Looks like:
1409(7899)/1928 at 1h47m25s] samba4.raw.session(ad_dc_ntvfs)
smbtorture 4.5.0pre1-DEVELOPERBUILD
Using seed 1467082080
UNEXPECTED(failure): samba4.raw.session.reauth1(ad_dc_ntvfs)
REASON: Exception: Exception: ../source4/torture/raw/session.c:70: status was NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, expected NT_STATUS_OK: setup2
Does get run in autobuild, so I think Ralph is
right about those tests.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list