[PATCHES] CTDB - fix script and documentation paths at build/install time
Michael Adam
obnox at samba.org
Thu Sep 10 10:21:38 UTC 2015
On 2015-09-10 at 20:18 +1000, Martin Schwenke wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:55:31 +1000, Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net>
> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > Currently CTDB's scripts and documentation aren't consistent with
> > build/install-time settings for various paths. This set of patches
> > attempts to fix that. The first few patches are clean-ups and the
> > rest make sure everything is set nicely at build/install time.
> >
> > These patches are in my ctdb-script-paths branch:
> >
> > https://git.samba.org/?p=martins/samba.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ctdb-script-paths
> >
> > git://git.samba.org/martins/samba.git (ctdb-script-paths branch)
> >
> > Review and push appreciated. Thanks!
>
> I've updated the branch above. I won't clutter the list by reposting...
>
> Changes from previous patchset are based on a partial review by Amitay.
>
> Changes are:
>
> * Tweak the wscript changes so variable names are simpler and are more
> consistent with the way things are already done.
>
> * Drop this patch:
>
> ctdb-scripts: Prefer configuration and initscripts in SYSCONFDIR
>
> My main concern here was to make sure the CTDB configuration can be
> loaded regardless of installation prefix. However, this is already
> OK. If the prefix is /usr/local then the configuration can live
> in /usr/local/etc/ctdb/ctdbd.conf. This works fine.
>
> This patch also tried to address ability to load configuration for
> other subsystems (e.g. NFS) that aren't installed as part of a
> distribution. It didn't do a good job of that so I'm happy to make
> another attempt at this later.
>
> The patch also had a bug. :-)
>
> Michael, I understand you'd like to review this. If you're happy with
> it then please post a "Reviewed-by:" rather than pushing. I'd also
> like to give Amitay a chance to comment on the last few patches that he
> didn't get to yesterday... :-)
I will review and reply later..
Cheers - Michael
> I've tested this with the default prefix of /usr/local and starting
> CTDB with ctdbd_wrapper, as well as building RPMs using CTDB's
> packaging support. I still need to test what happens in the case where
> xsltproc isn't available and perhaps make a minor change to the manpage
> handling.
>
> Thanks!
>
> peace & happiness,
> martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20150910/77cb35cd/attachment.sig>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list