Do anyone here have the experience with 64bits compiled Samba on SPARC?

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Ralph,

Am 01.12.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de>:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:18:39PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 06:20:40AM +0100, Jiri Sasek - Solaris Prague wrote:
>>>> I have built 64bits Samba and winbindd is receiving the SIGBUS(*)
>>> 
>>> The problem is that we don't have SPARC in any way easily
>>> accessible. If you look at CLANG warnings, there's hundreds
>>> of alignment problems we potentially have. Fixing all of
>>> them will be a big challenge, but finding the relevant ones
>>> would be much easier if we had access to such a box.
>>> 
>>> Volker
>> 
>> I can provide access to our Solaris buildfarm and already wrote to both
>> build at samba.org and Jeremy some time ago but didn’t get a reply.
> 
> iirc you got a reply from me saying that https://build.samba.org/ is
> essentially dead. Automated testing has moved to autobuild which is
> Linux only atm.

Ah yes, I remember now, sorry. I’d be happy to provide automatic builds on
Solaris if that would be possible.

> fwiw: slowfranklin at opencsw.org = slow at samba.org = me :) I have access,
> but I'm lacking time.

Ok, if anybody else from the Samba project (Volker?) needs access just let
me know.


Best regards

  — Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20151201/736ff396/signature.sig>