Patch: Implement FSCTL_LMR_REQUEST_RESILIENCY

Fri Oct 10 04:09:12 MDT 2014

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> On 2014-10-09 at 16:43 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Yeah, we can do that.
> But we have to make sure that the documentation
> carries a big fat disclaimer. Also the code
> should spit out warning debug messages when these
> are used.
> 
> We could do the same for persistent handles,
> ca shares, etc. We have code that implements
> parameters to trigger these options since >= 2 years
> but only used them for test and development purposes.
> We never proposed them upstream, because there is no
> flesh behind them yet, and they are hence dangerous
> if used in real setups. But I could imagine bringing
> these to master with the "fake " prefix as tracer
> ammunition so that people can see in test setups where
> the journey is leading...

What about adding that only in developer builds?

Volker

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de