Winbindd using 100% of CPU. Any solution?
Richard Sharpe
realrichardsharpe at gmail.com
Mon Dec 16 11:46:26 MST 2013
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The build I got onto the customer system did not have the damn patch
> to dump core when we hit that problem.
>
> Trying again with a new build.
We got a hit or two:
[2013/12/16 13:28:21.454633, 0]
winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3148(initialize_winbindd_cach
e)
initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with
version number 2
[2013/12/16 13:28:21.933631, 0]
winbindd/winbindd_util.c:330(trustdom_list_done)
Got invalid trustdom response:OIAA. Cannot get the SID for (NULL SID).
[2013/12/16 13:33:21.467075, 0]
winbindd/winbindd_util.c:330(trustdom_list_done)
Got invalid trustdom response:OIAA. Cannot get the SID for (NULL SID).
[2013/12/16 13:33:21.469075, 0]
winbindd/winbindd_dual.c:1404(fork_domain_child)
adding 0x8033730a0 to list at 0xeac360
[2013/12/16 13:33:21.473075, 0] lib/util.c:1117(smb_panic)
PANIC (pid 3190): duplicate!
[2013/12/16 13:33:21.481075, 0] lib/util.c:1221(log_stack_trace)
BACKTRACE: 10 stack frames:
#0 0x5a51cc <smb_panic+108> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#1 0x4bcf48 <wb_child_domain+1224> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#2 0x4b92c3 <wb_child_request_send+291> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#3 0x5bdb09 <_tevent_queue_create+361> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#4 0x5bbef8 <tevent_common_loop_immediate+488> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#5 0x5b8a42 <run_events_poll+82> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#6 0x5b929b <get_timed_events_timeout+395> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#7 0x5ba50f <_tevent_loop_once+223> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#8 0x48a5d5 <main+2613> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
#9 0x48702e <_start+142> at /usr/local/sbin/winbindd
[2013/12/16 13:33:21.481075, 0] lib/fault.c:372(dump_core)
dumping core in /core
We are getting this consistently now.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list