samba4: bind error #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1

[Kev Latimer]

On 19/04/2012 10:32, steve wrote:
> On 19/04/12 10:39, Kev Latimer wrote:
>> On 19/04/2012 09:38, Kev Latimer wrote:
>>> On 18/04/2012 16:04, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:34 PM, steve<steve at steve-ss.com>  wrote:
>>>>> 4.0.0alpha20-GIT-c69c07e openSUSE 12.1 bind 9.8
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi. A strange problem with bind not starting after overwriting a 
>>>>> git from 2
>>>>> weeks ago. Something like 'should be version 1 not version 2'
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to default to the new bind unless we add:
>>>>> #define BIND_VERSION_9_8    1
>>>>> to:
>>>>> source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h
>>>>>
>>>>> to get this bit right:
>>>>> #ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8
>>>>> #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1
>>>>> #else
>>>>> #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>
>>> This is BIND 9.8.1-P1, same BIND as I've been using throughout.
>>>
>>> My C isn't good enough to figure out why it isn't making two files, 
>>> I'm afraid :-P
>>> -- 
>>> Kev
>>
>>
> Hi
> Me neither but I see it as:
>
> if BIND_VERSION_9_8 is defined somewhere (I defined it before hitting 
> that bit of the header, in the same file) then it will build the so 
> for 9.8. Otherwise it will build the so for 9.9. Because it's an 
> if-else it does one thing or the other. If you don't have 9.8, it does 
> the other.
>
> Should there be 2 files or just one?
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>

According to Amitay, it should build two files, dlz_bind9.so for 9.8 and 
dlz_bind9_9.so for 9.9; for us, it just seems to build a single file, 
dlz_bind9.so, which only works on 9.9...

I used the same trick as you did to build a 9.8 module and I'm back up 
and running.

The only thing I can think of is that we upgraded our Samba's to reach 
this problem, no fresh install.  Think I'll quickly build it on a 
different machine and see if a new install makes a difference on the 
modules it builds?
-- 
Kev