S4: upgrade provision problems

[Trever L. Adams]

 On 10/15/2010 08:55 AM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 15/10/2010 18:39, Trever L. Adams wrote:
>>   On 10/15/2010 08:31 AM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>> Ok this means that you have something in the security.NTACL, it's
>>> where we store the NT ACLS, this test was done to be sure that you are
>>> able somehow to store extended attributes. Could it be selinux playing
>>> some nasty trick on us ? Can you desactivate it and retry ?
>> It is set in permissive. It shouldn't be doing anything at all (other
>> than giving me errors in log files, but no actual denials). I have set
>> it to disabled, I will have to wait around 10 hours before I can reboot
>> the machine and do the test again.
> Well it's just in case
Sorry, I got side tracked. The problem still exists with it set to disabled.
>>>   If not ok still I'll make a small patch for debug.
>>> Apart from the error message, is there a real pb (ie. gpo broken).
>>> Matthieu
>>>
>> No, everything works thanks to help from you previously. It would be
>> good to know what is going on. (BTW, the other machine has the exact
>> same settings/files/etc for selinux.)
>>
> For the moment I didn't have any clue but I'll find it for sure !!!
>
>
> Matthieu.

Thank you to you and all the team!

Trever


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101018/1562cf71/attachment.pgp>