ntacl and upgradeprovision patches

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:32 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:

> 
> Needless to say that with this set of patch upgradeprovision is able to 
> upgrade properly an alpha10 provision with your patches (that were 
> reverted then by tridge) and without.
> 
> This set of patch a built upon the fact that the changeset 
> 2cedefabc93c8a1fcb49d65a3f78a344e814f826 is reverted.
> 
> Andrew: can you give me your comments on those patches ?

I tried to merge these, and the other branches you pushed to your repo,
but kept running into issues - both the compile fix you noted on IRC
(easily fixed) and then failures in 'make test'.  

Can you let me know when you have a rebased branch of the ACL and
upgradeprovision patches that passes 'make test'?  

I'm sorry I couldn't keep working on it, but I have a demo to rig (my
talk at the SysAdmin mini-conf before linux.conf.au :-)

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100113/6868afeb/attachment.pgp>