Smbtorture test BASE-RENAME fails against a GPFS share
Abhidnya P Chirmule
achirmul at in.ibm.com
Sun Sep 13 23:31:07 MDT 2009
Hi List,
Any idea on following problem?
Thanks and Regards
Abhidnya Chirmule
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scale Out NAS
IBM India - Systems and Technology Lab,
ETZ-3B-104, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi Phase-II, Pune-411057
achirmul at in.ibm.com Work: +91-20-42026208, Cell: +91-9881452885
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abhidnya P
Chirmule/India/IB
M at IBMIN To
Sent by: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
samba-technical-b cc
ounces at lists.samb Dietmar Fischer
a.org <dfischer at de.ibm.com>, Klaus Smolin
<SMOLIN at de.ibm.com>
Subject
09/10/2009 10:44 Smbtorture test BASE-RENAME fails
AM against a GPFS share
Hi List,
I am trying to solve a bug found while running smbtorture BASE-RENAME test
on Samba 3.4. smbtorture test BASE-RENAME ran against a GPFS share fails.
In this test, there are 3 scenarios out of which 2 fail.
The first failure(second test scenario) is expected as samba doesn't
support FILE_SHARE_DELETE yet for GPFS.
The second failure(third test scenario) is because the samba GPFS-module
was using "open-accessmask" to set-sharemode instead of "access_mask".
This problem can be fixed by extending FLOCK VFS calls to handle additional
parameter called "access_mask".
Please let me know the views/suggestions or any workarounds to fix this.
Thanks
Abhidnya
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list