Is there a reason to have source4 in 3.4 releases?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 03:14:50PM +0400, Gennady G. Marchenko wrote:
>    I think that if it (sources smb4 in smb3.4) will need for further  
> development so let keep it as is. If doesn't - it is a good idea to  
> remove it. IMHO.

Well, it's very handy to have at least the smbtorture4
utility around for development. It's not strictly required
for production servers, but probably at some point we'll
ship it anyway due to the Franky approach to getting an 
AD DC asap.

So, for 3.4.1 if users really complain, we could remove it.

Andrew, what kinds of requests did you get exactly? Sorry,
but I missed them somehow.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090715/e3b14992/attachment.pgp>