Patch for supporting controls in ldbadd/ldbmodify and ldbdel
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Dec 15 14:21:29 MST 2009
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 16:37 +0200, Nadezhda Ivanova wrote:
> OK, if it bothers you so much I will remove it, although from my point of view its unnecessary complicating things.
Indeed. While the current approach 'use ldb_request' nicely handles ABI
issues, it does so by simply pushing all the complexity back onto the
callers, which all then must implement very similar wrappers, or
endlessly repeat complex boilerplate.
A similar thing has happened with the async module stack, and other
parts of LDB, and I really don't think it has made LDB a better
library.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20091216/0fc753ec/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list