svn commit: samba r21125 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/raw: .

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 09:43 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
>  > This patch accepts the NEW/OLD/MODIFIED entries in any order.
>  > 
>  > Comments welcome!
> I think we should at least give a warning for the wrong order. I know
> it's hard to get the order right with inotify, but I don't think its
> impossible. For example, we could buffer an event waiting for the
> other half to turn up.
> 
> Jelmer, maybe a torture_warning() function would be useful? It would
> be used when we don't want to flag an test failure, but we do want to
> flag something that isn't quite right and that a developer should look
> at if they are working on a paricular subsystem.
Yes, I agree that would be nice. I'll have a look at integrating it into
my testsuite changes.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070204/15f1123b/attachment.bin