svn commit: samba r18030 -
in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .
tridge at samba.org
tridge at samba.org
Mon Sep 4 22:13:45 GMT 2006
Jeremy,
> > None at all. C++ is a superset of C.
ummm ....
>
> Except for the irritating sytactic differences we've already
> noticed of course :-).
which is why we're having this discussion!
Not being able to declare a structure inside a structure is to me a
pretty significant loss of syntax.
> As you know, it has always been my dream eventually to have Samba
> in C++ :-). So moving closer to it is a good thing IMHO.
Do you really want to switch to C++ ??
I'm really trying to understand what the driving need behind the C++
compatibility is. If its for warnings then thats one thing, but if
you really want to switch Samba development to C++ then thats a pretty
major change and merits some discussion I think.
Cheers, Tridge
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list