[PATCH] groups in ldap

[Simo Sorce]

I have to object to this code sorry.

We need group handling in ldap for sure, but not group mapping (mapping
should be a very secondary part of group support, like username map for
users.

Using the group mapping approach will make very hard for us to upgrade
to the right way in future.

Simo.

On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 07:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 09:14, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Here's my first attempt at putting the group mapping into ldap. It
> > should apply to HEAD.
> > 
> > Comments? Especially the schema might be discussed, this is my very
> > first attempt at LDAP schema design.
> 
> Well, on a 30-second reading, I have to say it looks good!
> 
> Thanks for putting the time into this,
> 
> Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030318/bf4039e6/attachment.bin