FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Tue Mar 11 18:03:21 GMT 2003
Nir Soffer wrote:
:
:
> It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the case of encrypt
> passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a UNICODE one. Is
> this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request non-unicode passwords,
> but still support non-unicode filenames?)
Unicode is either ON or OFF. If Unicode is negotiated, then the Windows
clients will try to send a Unicode password.
> This is definitely broken now if this the case, regardless where the bug
> is...
There are bugs in the Windows clients, clearly, but I think that we can work
around them. I also think that smbclient needs to be tested in this regard.
Chris -)-----
PS. It would also be nice (hint to others on this list) if Ethereal were
patched to read these messed-up packets correctly. :)
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list