Killing paramters: status

[Andrew Bartlett]

"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> 
> > Can anybody give me a good reason to run 'status = no'.
> >
> > Apart from providing a minuscule performance gain and breaking plenty of
> > things (yes, I think status = no is probably buggy), is there a reason
> > for this parameter not to die (i.e. always status = yes)?
> 
> Please poll samba at samba.org to see if anyone bites.  If someone
> if using (even incorrectly), it will help us to guage
> the impact of removing it.

When I went to remove it from the code, I found I had already done it
months ago...

:-)

I'll send a message on all these changes, when I'm finished this
'discussion'

Its still there in 2.2

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net