verbose debugs of socket messages
Gerald Carter
gcarter at valinux.com
Thu May 10 15:58:42 GMT 2001
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> J.F. typed:
> :
> > yes it would allow it. I think we should split the DEBUG from the LOGGING.
> > We are using the DEBUG facility as a LOGGING facility.
> >
> > IIRC, I talked of that with Tridge, and we agreed.
>
> It would also be nice to allow people to remove debug statements at
> compile time, though debug should be the default mode since we use the
> output so heavily.
Ehhh....I'm not sure I agree here. That's kind of like saying, it ouwld
be nice if we could remove the steering wheel from a car for a nice long
strech of highway. But what happens when you need to turn. IMO there
will always be a need to enabling debugging at run-time in order to
trouble shoot problems.
I do think that separating logging from debug would be good.
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list