question about SPOOL_Q_SETPRINTER
Gerald Carter
gcarter at valinux.com
Wed Mar 28 16:57:18 GMT 2001
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Gerald Carter wrote:
>
> > In the following typedef from rpc_spoolss.h, why is the secdesc_ctr a
> > pointer and the devmode_ctr a struct? This seems inconsistent to me.
> > Especially since, a SEC_DESC_BUF is required in the structure sent
> > to the print server (even in the case of a NULL security descriptor).
>
> because proper sec_desc was added much later to spoolss.
>
> Even if it is inconsistant (need to check the IDL first to be sure), I
> urge you to NOT change it now. It works, don't change it. It's not the
> right moment to do such a change.
btw....I think it is consistent with the actual IDL. Just seems
and odd interface to me. Oh well... :-)
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list