[samba-tng] spoolss conversion is complete!

[Jean Francois Micouleau]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> 1) it's so that other people can write alternative implementations
> (including me!) _without_ having to worry about marshalling and
> unmarshalling.  why should they???

I don't know anybody willing to rewrite code when it's already available
for free with the source.

> 2) we can replace the marshalling code with auto-generated code.

Err! we could already. The parsing code is separated from server/client
code since at least Nov. 97.

> 3) it's possible to write stubs like this, for use as dynamic-runtime
> loading:

if it's just for stub why didn't you renamed samr_open() to _samr_open() 
and created a stub samr_open() ? 

> you get the idea?

nope. sorry.