ACL / SDs

[Cole, Timothy D.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Elrond [SMTP:Elrond at Wunder-Nett.org]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 23, 2000 8:04
> To:	Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL
> Subject:	Re: ACL / SDs
> 
> So that means, that the order of the ACEs _is_ important?
> As far, as I understood SDs in NT, the order shouldn't be
> important... but maybe that's only for the actual
> access-checking.
> 
	Not only is order important, the access-checking rules seem to be
insanely complex.  I have a hell of a time composing NT ACLs without
actually trying them out to make sure they do what I think they should do
(they often don't).