[Samba] Which sub version of Samba 4.19 will be considered for Debian bookworm-backports?
mjt at tls.msk.ru
Tue Sep 5 18:37:55 UTC 2023
05.09.2023 20:20, Peter Milesson via samba пишет:
> Hi folks,
> I'm just curious about which subversion of Samba 4.19 that will trickle down to Debian bookworm-backports?
> I have a hunch I saw a note from either Rowland or Louis van Belle quite a few years back on this list, that the .0 and .1, and possibly .2 versions
> of Samba, are not considered stable enough for production. Please, correct me if I have got it wrong.
> Otherwise it would be interesting to know, as I plan integration with Microsoft Azure later this year. What I understand, Microsoft has changed the
> requirements to at least AD forest level 2016 for that integration, while previously 2008R2 was sufficient.
“Patience you must have, my young Padawan. Have patience and all will be revealed."
You're asking a wrong question by now.
As you might have noticed, I already uploaded 4.19.0 to unstable. Unlike with all previous
releases in debian which were uploaded to experimental first, due to a number of reasons,
and were faced unstable at release .1 or up only.
I'm not saying 4.19 is more stable than experimental, but let's give it a try in unstable
first and see how it goes. Next we can decide if it's okay to have 4.19.0 in bookworm-
backports or it will be 4.19.10.
If you really want 4.19.0 on bookqworm or even bullseye *now* to try freshest functionality,
you can grab binaries from my repository - it has 4.19.0 since yesterday. Just don't forget
to switch to bpo12 once version wanted by you is in there.
More information about the samba