[Samba] Synology shares not accessible...
foren at asche-rz.de
Thu Jun 29 08:21:44 UTC 2023
Mostly you have second what I thought already. At least what they say
about using an old Samba version.
Another thought just accured to me: But why they changed it after three
years the change is already in use. Why now? But as you said, that's
something only Synology can answer.
Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 29.06.2023 um 10:00:
> My reading of the above (which could be wrong) is:
> A respected member of the Samba team decided that using 'lookupsids'
> wasn't required just to find out if the SID was a user or group, other
> Samba team members agreed and the code was altered and backported to a
> couple of earlier versions.
> It would seem that synology disagreed with this, possibly because of
> other changes they have made (that is a pure guess) and have reverted
> that change, or to put it another way, they seem to have forked Samba.
> On top of that, they seem to be recommending using old EOL versions of
> Samba, versions that could contain bugs that have been fixed in later
> versions, these 'bugs' could be CVE related.
> What conclusions to make from that is up to you, but this just
> confirms what I thought about synology.
More information about the samba