[Samba] Failed to convert SID to a UID
rpenny at samba.org
Mon Jun 12 13:45:29 UTC 2023
On 12/06/2023 14:25, Robert Marcano via samba wrote:
>>> the two commands are on the public question, the pay walled answer is
>>> about why the name change. It is still useful.
>> To a certain extent, the commands, without the reason why they
>> changed, will never be as useful as the commands with the reason why
>> they changed.
> for you, Let others decide what is useful for them or not. That is the
> only reason I still post in this usually hostile mailing list.
I cannot influence how anyone thinks, I can only post what I think. I
know that I come across as terse, but that was the way I was brought up,
don't use a lot of words when one or two will do. I do not think that at
the age of 67 that I am likely to change.
If you look carefully at what I posted there, I was agreeing with you,
but I added a rider that without context it is hard to understand why
the commands changed and if they are actually needed at all. From my
perspective, they are not required, a Samba Unix domain member worked as
expected on Rocky Linux 8 & 9 without them, or so my testing has proven
to myself, others may have a different experience.
From my testing over the last week or so, setting up a Samba Unix
domain member isn't that much different whatever distro you use, it is
the differences in the distros that you have to work around.
More information about the samba