[Samba] Updates wanting to uninstall Samba on member server

[Ingo Asche]

Michael is totally correct. I had several month ago experimented on this 
server with Louis pinning script after he has changed his late 
repository to Samba 4.16 and Debian backports.

I didn't thaught this would haunt me some days later, but I forgot to 
delete one file which has done pinning for several files.

After deletion now the update process runs correct again...

Sorry again for that bother...

Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama

Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 04.11.2022 um 10:46:
> 03.11.2022 22:57, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using apticron to get informed of updates. Today I got informed 
>> from one of my DCs that there are five packages can be updated from 
>> backports:
> ...
>> Message from "apt list --upgradable":
>> Listing... Done
>> libtalloc2/bullseye-backports 2.3.4-2~bpo11+1 arm64 [upgradable from: 
>> 2.3.3-4~bpo11+1]
>> libtdb1/bullseye-backports 1.4.7-2~bpo11+1 arm64 [upgradable from: 
>> 1.4.6-3~bpo11+1]
>>
>> Message from "apt full-upgrade":
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree... Done
>> Reading state information... Done
>> Calculating upgrade... Done
>> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
>> required:
>>    bind9-dnsutils ibverbs-providers libboost-thread1.74.0 libbrotli-dev
>>    libcephfs2 libcups2 libfreetype-dev libgfapi0 libgfrpc0 libgfxdr0
>>    libglusterfs0 libibverbs1 libpng-dev libpng-tools librados2 
>> librdmacm1
>>    liburing1 python3-dnspython python3-gpg python3-ldb python3-markdown
>>    python3-pygments python3-requests-toolbelt python3-yaml 
>> samba-dsdb-modules
>>    samba-vfs-modules tdb-tools zlib1g-dev
>> Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them.
>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>>    libnss-winbind libpam-winbind python3-samba python3-talloc 
>> python3-tdb samba
>>    samba-common-bin winbind
>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>>    libtalloc2 libtdb1
>> 2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 8 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> Need to get 77.7 kB of archives.
>> After this operation, 47.4 MB disk space will be freed.
>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>>
>> Any ideas on that?
>
> This was a mis-configuration of priority pinning in /etc/apt/preferences
> of some sort. It works without any preferences file correctly out of 
> the box.
> My guess about incomplete debian backports archive was wrong.
>
> /mjt
>