[Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)

Michael Tokarev mjt at tls.msk.ru
Sat May 14 13:44:10 UTC 2022

13.05.2022 12:42, L. van Belle wrote:
> Hai Michael,
> Some monitoring tools need the option in d/rules --with-profiling-data
> https://learn.netdata.cloud/docs/agent/collectors/python.d.plugin/samba/
> https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netdata
> I know there are users using my repo specialy for this.
> All I added to d/rules here is :
>          --with-profiling-data
> This one is save to enable.

Ah, that makes sense. Maybe it should be enabled in debian builds too.
Especially if it comes for free ;)  Thank you for the info.

> The other part.  Gnome tracker support
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend
> in the beginning, when trackers was added, we needed.
>          libtracker-sparql-2.0-dev and libtracker-miner-2.0-dev
> This is one I discussed with Matteu, and he decided that it was pulling in to much extra depends.
> so it was desiced not to enable it. Meanwhile, I did have people asking for it.
> So, I enabled it some time ago in my repo packages.

Aha.  Yea I remember seeing some discussion about this, Matteu said this
brings glib dependency which is a bit too much. I didn't know how to enable
it though, this build dependency makes it clear. Thank you again :)

> Last on these build depends conflicts..
> I use multiple repos to build my packages..
> basicly its.
> bullseye
> Bullseye-backuports
> vanBelle Online
> vanBelle Internal1-test
> vanBelle Internal2-dev
> one package (ldb) was builded already and in one of my internal repos.
> that one was pulled in from 2-dev repo and builded samba with.
> that shouldn't have happened, human error..
> It conflicts with the backports version.
> The test also pulled it in so I didn't notice it, just I already removed
> these
>   test-dev packages from my upload tree..
> arrh..  So no error on your side.

Aha. That makes sense. The thing is that I had several attempts to make
ldb version "right" and it always conflicting... so I thought it is another
iteration ;)

> And cant say it enough...
> THANKS for all the work you done.

Well.. I just wanted to fix a bug, you know... ;)))  It just so happened...

But I spoiled your work somewhat, too, - I didn't want to, really did not, -
instead, I hoped to help you just a bit to get more recent samba into
debian :)

And than you for all the work you've done!  Actually, I don't think I'd
get into there without your packages serving as an example.


More information about the samba mailing list