[Samba] Broken Dependencies?

Dirk Laurenz samba at laurenz.ws
Tue May 10 14:12:47 UTC 2022


THanks a lot from me too

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.P.H. van
> Belle via samba
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21
> An: samba at lists.samba.org
> Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws>
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> 
> Hi Dirk
> 
> > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?
> That?s possible now, correct.
> 
> Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba..
> I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me.
> Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far.
> An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely.
> Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet.
> 
> As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update samba
> anymore in debian for new stable.
> Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in.
> He fixed a lot already.
> 
> I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed.
> I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule.
> 
> So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on
debian-backports
> Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend.
> then you must use my packages.
> 
> Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully rely on
the
> maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine.
> but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes..
> way to much work. (* sorry)
> 
> and please to read the change logs, before you install them.
> https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html
> 
> 
> Greetz,
> 
> Louis
> 
> 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32
> > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org
> > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> >
> > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van
> > > Belle via samba
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36
> > > An: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > >
> > > Hai Dirk,
> > >
> > > Can you give me a output of both servers.
> > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "
> > >
> > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this
> > > in
> > newer
> > > version.
> > >
> > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1
> > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1
> > >
> > > S is higher that L
> > >
> > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again..
> > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options.
> > > All data and configs  will stay as is..
> > >
> > > The new format will be  for the 4.16 line.
> > >
> > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1	< not sure if i will build these.
> > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported
> > > on
> > buster.
> > >
> > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1
> > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1	< not sure if i will build
these,
> > > same reason as above but for focal.
> > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1
> > >
> > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+
> > >
> > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1
> > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye-
> > > backports&arch=any&searcho
> > > n=names&keywords=samba
> > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer)  provided already a backport.
> > >
> > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports,
> > > not much anymore.
> > >
> > > last changelog.
> > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium
> > >
> > >   * Non-maintainer upload.
> > >   * Rebuild from bullseye-backports.
> > >     Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends
> > >   * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter
> > >   * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend
> > >     This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend.
> > >     Info
> > >
> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend
> > >
> > >  -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl>  Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16
> > > +0200
> > >
> > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these
> > > will be
> > online
> > > this week.
> > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now.
> > >
> > > PS. Small side note,
> > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba
> > > does
> > not
> > > support SSSD yet.
> > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801
> > >
> > >
> > > Greetz,
> > >
> > > Louis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39
> > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all
> > sources.list
> > > to
> > > > bullseye.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of
van-belle.list:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list
> > > >
> > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba.
> > > >
> > > > #deb [arch=armhf
> > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main
> > > >
> > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while
upgrading.
> > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update
> > > >
> > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye
> > > > InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest
> > > > bullseye InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge
> > InRelease
> > > >
> > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge
> > > > Release
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade
> > > >
> > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig
> > > >
> > > > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig
> > > >
> > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig
> > > >
> > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig
> > > >
> > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht
> > > aktualisiert.
> > > >
> > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba
> > > >
> > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
> > > >
> > > >   acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a}
> > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-
> markdown{a}
> > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b}
> > > >
> > > >   samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a}
> > > >
> > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden
> > > > entfernt und
> > 0
> > > nicht
> > > > aktualisiert.
> > > >
> > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven müssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach
> > > > dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zusätzlich belegt sein.
> > > >
> > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abhängigkeiten:
> > > >
> > > > samba : Hängt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed
> > > >
> > > >          Hängt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht
> > > > installationsfähig
> > > >
> > > >          Hängt ab von: samba-common-bin (=
> > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
> > > aber
> > > > nicht installationsfähig
> > > >
> > > >          Hängt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual
> > package
> > > and is not
> > > > provided by any available package
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >          Hängt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
> > > > aber
> > > nicht
> > > > installationsfähig
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the
> > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >      Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version:
> > > >
> > > > 1)     samba [Nicht installiert]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba




More information about the samba mailing list