[Samba] Broken Dependencies?

Tue May 10 13:21:18 UTC 2022

Hi Dirk 

> If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?
That?s possible now, correct.

Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. 
I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. 
Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. 
An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely.
Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. 

As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) 
we cant update samba anymore in debian for new stable.
Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. 
He fixed a lot already. 

I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed. 
I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule. 

So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on debian-backports 
Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. 
then you must use my packages. 

Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael,
and I fully rely on the maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. 
but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. 
way to much work. (* sorry) 

and please to read the change logs, before you install them. 
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html 

Greetz, 

Louis

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32
> Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> 
> If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle
> > via samba
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36
> > An: samba at lists.samba.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> >
> > Hai Dirk,
> >
> > Can you give me a output of both servers.
> > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "
> >
> > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this in
> newer
> > version.
> >
> > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1
> > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1
> >
> > S is higher that L
> >
> > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again..
> > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options.
> > All data and configs  will stay as is..
> >
> > The new format will be  for the 4.16 line.
> >
> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1	< not sure if i will build these.
> > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported on
> buster.
> >
> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1
> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1	< not sure if i will build these,
> > same reason as above but for focal.
> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1
> >
> > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+
> >
> > if you want sooner to 4.16.1
> > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye-
> > backports&arch=any&searcho
> > n=names&keywords=samba
> > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer)  provided already a backport.
> >
> > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports,
> > not much anymore.
> >
> > last changelog.
> > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium
> >
> >   * Non-maintainer upload.
> >   * Rebuild from bullseye-backports.
> >     Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends
> >   * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter
> >   * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend
> >     This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend.
> >     Info
> >
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend
> >
> >  -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl>  Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16
> > +0200
> >
> > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will
> > be
> online
> > this week.
> > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now.
> >
> > PS. Small side note,
> > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba
> > does
> not
> > support SSSD yet.
> > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801
> >
> >
> > Greetz,
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39
> > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all
> sources.list
> > to
> > > bullseye.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list
> > >
> > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba.
> > >
> > > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main
> > >
> > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading.
> > > When I now want to reinstall I get this.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update
> > >
> > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease
> > >
> > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease
> > >
> > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease
> > >
> > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease
> > >
> > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest
> > > bullseye InRelease
> > >
> > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge
> InRelease
> > >
> > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge
> > > Release
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade
> > >
> > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig
> > >
> > > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig
> > >
> > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig
> > >
> > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig
> > >
> > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht
> > aktualisiert.
> > >
> > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba
> > >
> > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
> > >
> > >   acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a}
> > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a}
> > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b}
> > >
> > >   samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a}
> > >
> > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt
> > > und
> 0
> > nicht
> > > aktualisiert.
> > >
> > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven müssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach
> > > dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zusätzlich belegt sein.
> > >
> > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abhängigkeiten:
> > >
> > > samba : Hängt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed
> > >
> > >          Hängt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht
> > > installationsfähig
> > >
> > >          Hängt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1)
> > > ist
> > aber
> > > nicht installationsfähig
> > >
> > >          Hängt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual
> package
> > and is not
> > > provided by any available package
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >          Hängt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
> > > aber
> > nicht
> > > installationsfähig
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the
> > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version:
> > >
> > > 1)     samba [Nicht installiert]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba